Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Emmanuelle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguments for delete are strong. There appears to be a possibility that she may pass WP:Politician sometime in the future, the article can be recreated at that point in time. —SpacemanSpiff 01:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Emmanuelle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHITS or GNEWS of substance. Article lacks adequate references to support notability. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN ttonyb (talk) 23:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'd vote for her, but I can't see how she passes WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. Am I missing something? Bearian (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN and I'm not seeing sufficient reliable (secondary) source coverage to pass WP:GNG. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I recommend keeping this article. She is a rising individual in the political scene and until April 6, 2010 we won't know if she is elected to the city council. Also, I believe that as the chairperson of Clear Vision Eau Claire and as a board member of many councils and committees, she is notable enough. --Development Editor (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I suggest you read WP:UPANDCOMING. Additionally, you have not demonstrated how she meets WP:BIO, WP:GNG, or WP:POLITICIAN. ttonyb (talk) 01:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete latest article by this editor that does not meet WP:BIO, WP:POLITICIAN. --Baron Larf 02:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN now. Royal broil 02:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a possibility she may be elected to the Wisconsin Legislature or some other office. As it stands now this article is premature. Thank you-RFD (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why doesn't the Spectator article constitute "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article" from WP:POLITICIAN ? Is more then one source necessary? Full disclosure - I live in Eau Claire which is why I'm asking this as a question instead of voting. --Camipco (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.