Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Duc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Catherine Duc[edit]
- Catherine Duc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable artist Lester Foster (talk | talk) 19:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Searching through Google, and clicking through this list of reviews and interviews; it seems the artist has received attention in several New Age-centric blogs/zines. However, I'm not really convinced that there are multiple reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. I admit I'm not too familiar with the vast majority of these sites so I will be happy to reconsider. Gong show 22:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (cackle) @ 22:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (deliver) @ 22:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless actual good sources can be found. (The one source in the article presently shows "Page not found".) We can't have BLPs with this level of sourcing - David Gerard (talk) 12:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Article certainly needs work, but a Hollywood Music in Media Awards nomination is not to be sniffed at and coverage in a fair number of music sites looks good enough under WP:BAND to me. Bondegezou (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Aired on national radio, two albums, and won international awards. Notable enough for an article.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if Duc has been on rotation on ABC Jazz, then she'd meet criteia #11 of WP:MUSIC quite handily. However, the reference used to support this doesn't actually say that, it just links to a short bio on the ABC Jazz website. Therefore, I don't think we can take it as granted that she's received significant airplay there. In terms of the references, apart from the usual promotional stuff I'm not seeing much significant third-party coverage, a search of AU/NZ newspapers and Factiva also drew a blank. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Satisfies criteria #9 of WP:MUSIC. Have located a number of independent verifiable references relating to her awards, which I have included in the article - this should address some of the concerns raised by the editors above . Dan arndt (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets WP:MUSBIO with the documented awards. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Meets GNG and has awards to meet N. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 11:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.