Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Bragg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Bragg[edit]

The article has no references whatsoever. Unless this is fixed, the article cannot stay. --Pieces839 (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the subject is holder of important post at UN. @nominator: Try Google Search, Google News search or Google News Archive before nominating an article. Look also at WP:RUBBISH, please. The information contained in the article is not harmful and it could be easy to add missing refs/fix the article. Vejvančický (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. References from Reliable Sources are easily available. I'll add some in a bit, but the ones I see from Reuters (for example) are sufficient to warrant a Keep. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, senior UN official, UN source has been added. Sandstein 21:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is not about the subject, it is about the article, which has zero refernces. If references are available as it seems then someone must add them. --Pieces839 (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has, in fact, a reference. Sandstein 20:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.