Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catboy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catboy

Subject fails to satisfy notability requirement for living persons. Folajimi 00:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Catgirl, i.e. revert to original version. Current version appears to be vanity by User:Widdop. dbtfz ^talk 01:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Catgirl per Dbtfz. --Allen 01:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Catgirl which was the original and better version. Thetruthbelow 01:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Catgirl. --Ter e nc e Ong 04:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nn - but I truly fail to see the logic in redirecting this to Catgirl. A catgirl is a girl with catlike features; they're common in pop culture, whereas male counterparts are nearly unheard of. We could move Catgirl to Cat-person and redirect both "Catgirl" and "Catboy" to that page, but, frankly, I think a better solution is just to out-and-out delete Catboy. --Hyperbole 05:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'd like to point out that many (most?) of the characters in the musical cats were catboys, that the main character of Final Fantasy IX was a catboy, and that the term shows up enough elsewhere that it deserves discussion. However, that seems to be done in Catgirl, although that article is fairly poor in general. Captainktainer 09:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Hyperbole. -- Kjkolb 06:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Dijxtra 07:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hyperbole. JIP | Talk 07:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 19:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Do not redirect/merge with catgirl, Catgirls are not relavent to this person. Beno1000 22:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn & is not relevant to Catgirl --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Just to clarify, I don't think any of us "redirect" voters are suggesting that Simon Smedley has anything to do with catgirls. We're saying that catboy should redirect to catgirl because catboys -- that is, male humans with cat ears and tails -- are relevant to catgirl. If you look at catgirl, you'll see that it does discuss catboys, in the fourth paragraph. --Allen 04:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This hasn't much to do with catwoman or catgirl or catcalls. Its just some obviously mediocre radio host. Though the bit on controversy had me enthralled.thenormalyears

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.