Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalina Cruz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (speedy deletion criterion A7). howcheng {chat} 23:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-article about another porn actress. Almost speediable as an empty article, but brought it here anyway. -R. fiend 18:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy. No assertion of notability. --Andy Saunders 19:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on the grounds of no assertion of notability. She may in fact be notable in her field (embarrassingly, I've heard of her, and I'm not a connoisseur); but if so, the article needs to describe more about that fact. Ikkyu2 22:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per Andy Saunders. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as random porn article. Stifle 12:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Randonm porm, nn --Brian1979 14:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't!. There are plenty of articles like this one. This stub should rather be expanded, and that is why it is related on stub categories. --FelipeBusnello 15:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If there are others, how about giving me a list of them? I'd be more than happy to see those deleted too. -R. fiend 17:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay then -- the onus is on people to expand the article to the point that it establishes her notability. Being a porn actress, in of itself, is not notable. However, until that is done, my vote is speedy delete due to no assertion of notability. --Andy Saunders 16:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. No claim to notability makes it a candidate for speedy delete but the AfD should be closing today anyway. I'll tag it as speedy anyway, what the heck. Ifnord 23:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.