Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CastleTown Shoppingworld

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CastleTown Shoppingworld[edit]

CastleTown Shoppingworld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. Shopping centres are not inherently notable. 1 gnew hit only. LibStar (talk) 14:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Local shopping centre with next to no significant notable coverage. Ajf773 (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 01:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.