Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassey Ho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cassey Ho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject's notability is dubious, and poorly supported by sources / external links. Most of these are primary sources, e.g. blogs created by or closely linked to the subject, and as such are probably not reliable. dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 23:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I don't see the blog interviews as necessarily associated with the subject, but that doesn't make them reliable. It seems like she is indeed gathering the sort of attention that could create significant 3rd party coverage, and YouTube personalities' fame does tend to grow exponentially after some point, but as of now there's really too little to satisfy notability, and simply not enough to justify a WP:BLP — Frankie (talk) 16:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hue Sat Lum 23:06, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 13:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 03:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.