Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassavettes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cassavettes[edit]

The subject of the article does not meet the guidelines for notability per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 00:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete notability not asserted - Tiswas^(t/c) 00:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet WP:MUSIC. janejellyroll 00:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability.--ZayZayEM 02:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete They do assert notability in their claim to have been chosen the best local band in Boston. However that may not rise to the standards of WP:MUSIC. The article does not meet WP:ATTRIBUTION which is critical especially in regards to their claim of best local band. JBEvans 14:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak Delete: They have appeared in the local papers here in Boston, and they did win the Phoenix's band poll (which strictly is who can send in the most letters with your band's name in to the paper). That isn't enough to clear WP:MUSIC, and this article plainly and gratingly butts heads against WP:SPAM as well. The article represents the creator's only Wikipedia activity, so WP:COI may well be in play. Ravenswing 17:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-fails WP:MUSIC, and the biography part is filled with POV and contains the word "our", so it's probably a COI as said above. There's also not one source in the whole article. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@(Lets go Yankees!) 17:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It fails WP:MUSIC and is written from the bands point of view. AltoSax 456 20:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced, doesn't meet WP:Music.--Paloma Walker 21:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced, [[WP:MUSIC, subjective POV, just delete it already. :-) --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete: Partly mets WP:MUSIC; they have received some international coverage (at least in Spain). Perhaps should be advisable to mark for "editing", and remove all POV parts. — 88.2.33.73 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 0:40 10 April 2007

Comment: Would you have any sources backing that up you'd like to share? Ravenswing 18:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.