Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cashmere Nicole
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 01:45, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cashmere Nicole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable -- any notability is as head of a company---but the company itself is of no notability or even significance. The personal details about her life are inappro priate in an encyclopedia ,and would be better suited to a PR write up. There's. extensive name-dropping, and making much of minor charities.
The refs, needless to say, are the expected promotional interviews. DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 05:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 05:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 05:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I've trimmed the puff and would say the significant coverage in reliable sources is beyond routine. Mujinga (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mild keep She was on Good Morning America and has a few other articles about her, I think just barely pushing this one over the notability hump. Oaktree b (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Remains entirely promotional and if the fluff were completely removed, there would be no content. Consider " endorsed by Tati Westbrook and Jacki Aina. In 2014, Nicole's story was featured on Beyoncé's website, Beyonce.com, as part of Breast Cancer Awareness Month.[4] [5] The firm is based in San Diego and promoted by Gabby Douglas. " -- 4 consecutive name-drops. And not everyone on GoodMorningAmerica is notable . Her firm has an article, but I don';t think it's notable either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 05:25, December 14, 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I chopped that section, feel free to chop more .. but the point is the sources and I would say articles in Forbes, Glamour, Allure, Ebony indicate notability on top of Good Morning America Mujinga (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Heartmusic678 (talk) 12:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:13, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Not to pleased with the comments about her personal life by the nominator. Many people with Wikipedia articles have had plenty of unsettling things happen in their lives that are in their articles. It ends up looking like this nomination is more WP:IDONTLIKEIT than anything else with comments like that. Regardless, she's notable. Sources:
- "How a Single Mom and Cancer Survivor Turned 1 Idea Into a Multimillion-Dollar Beauty Brand" - PopSugar
- "Cashmere Nicole Is What a 2019 CEO Looks Like" - Glamour (magazine)
- "How Beauty Bakerie founder Cashmere Nicole went from food stamps to launching a multi-million dollar cosmetics brand" - Good Morning America
- "How a single mom battling breast cancer built Beauty Bakerie to a 5 million brand and got Unilever to invest" - Forbes (not a contributor, an actual editor wrote this)
- "Beauty Bakerie CEO Cashmere Nicole Opens Up About the Inclusive Indie Makeup Brand's Massive Success" - Allure (magazine)
- "Beauty Bakerie's Cashmere Nicole Is Better, Not Bitter" - Paper (magazine)
- "Why the Motto 'Better Not Bitter' Changed Everything for Beauty Bakerie Founder Cashmere Nicole" - San Francisco Chronicle
- "How Breast Cancer & Beyoncé Fueled This Beauty Mogul's Appetite For Success" - Refinery29
- "Beauty Bakerie CEO Cashmere Nicole On What It's Like Having Beyoncé As A Customer" - Bustle (magazine)
- "How A 34-Year-Old Makeup Lover Grew One Of Beauty's Most Inclusive Brands" - Bustle (magazine)
- "Getting to Know Beauty Bakerie CEO Cashmere Nicole" - Ebony (magazine)
- "Indelible Beauty: Makeup Maven Cashmere Nicole Talks Success, Survival and Building a Brand Built to Last" - The Root (magazine)
- "Why the Motto 'Better Not Bitter' Changed Everything for Beauty Bakerie Founder Cashmere Nicole " - Entrepreneur (magazine)
- "Cashmere Nicole: How a Single Mom With Breast Cancer Founded Beauty Bakerie" - Women's Wear Daily
- "Cashmere Nicole Put Off Seeing A Doctor About The Lump In Her Breast Until It Was Too Big Too Ignore — And Cancerous" - MadameNoire
- "Beauty Bakerie CEO Cashmere Nicole Opens Up About the Inclusive Indie Makeup Brand's Massive Success" - Allure (magazine)]
- Keep per the argument made by Missvain. I, too, am discouraged by the comments in the nomination, even more so given the origins of this article. Since when do we not care for personal details? For context, this article was created during a gender-gap-focused edit-a-thon co-hosted by the White House. Almost all in attendance were young women of color hoping to close the gap by creating or editing articles about notable women in business. The article was later 'beefed' up by me using the sources highlighted above. Deleting when the sources are clearly 'there' sends a bad message to newer editors, especially those outside the typical editor profile.-Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 21:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.