Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Sheehan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge with Cindy Sheehan (non-admin closure). ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 16:11, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Sheehan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of thousands Iraq-war casualty, non-notable per WP:1E. The main source actually about the subject is a blog, the other ones, while they do mention Casey Sheehan, are about her mother; notability is not inherited. Other Google results are mostly blogs, memorials or activist sites. Suggest deletion then redirect to Cindy Sheehan. CharlieEchoTango (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge to Cindy Sheehan, no sense losing viable sourced information. Umbralcorax (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- Evaluate if single 'Casey Sheehan Didn't Die for Nothing' is significant cultural impact to satisfy GNG; if not, Merge & Redirect. Dru of Id (talk) 11:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cindy Sheehan. The death of this soldier was the impetus that caused his mother to become a notable activist, but isn't independently notable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cindy Sheehan. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable under WP:GNG as subject lacks "significant coverage" in WP:RS. Anotherclown (talk) 03:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cindy Sheehan as per Whpq above. --DGaw (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.