Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey DeSantis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Yunshui  09:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Casey DeSantis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tag removed with the explanation "how is a popular tv show host not notable?" Well, if the sourcing is insufficient, the person isn't notable. I don't think she has enough sources for WP:GNG, so let's discuss. Some of the sourcing is just about her notable husband, so WP:NOTINHERITED applies as well. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Local Emmys don't add up toward notability, and neither does running a local TV show. Drmies (talk) 04:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Clearly meets GNG with plenty of coverage in reliable sources. She is a host of a TV show which has garnered recognition and is potentially the next First Lady of Florida. A merge in her husband's article would be preferable to delete, but she still meets the notability bar. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 11:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • The coverage appears to be more about her husband than about her. A "TV show which has garnered recognition" is not part of the "notability bar", just significant coverage in reliable sources, and her coverage is not significant. And "potentially" the next First Lady of Florida, that's not a position that grants notability per WP:NPOL (the current First Lady of Florida doesn't have a page, only seven pages are categorized in Category:First Ladies and Gentlemen of Florida), and that's also WP:CRYSTAL. The page can be recreated if she does at some point become notable. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, though it's very borderline and the referencing looks a bit sloppy. Deb (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 01:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.