Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cary Barlowe
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cary Barlowe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deprodded with sources, but one only gives a one sentence mention, and the other only verifies that he wrote one notable song. While he was nominated for a Grammy, it was split among 3 other writers, none of whom have articles either. I searched high and low and could not find any reliable third party coverage of the guy, just tangential mentions and name drops. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 10:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment He's also co-written some other "notable" songs: Made to Love[1], I'm for You[2], City on Our Knees[3], Get Back Up[4], even if the only sources for him co-writing those are sheet music publishers. He clearly meets WP:COMPOSER, although that does seem a rather stupid rule in cases like this. --12:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC) --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:COMPOSER is not ironclad. It's possible to meet that but fail WP:GNG if no sources exist covering the guy in detail. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.