Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carver (Nip/Tuck)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Nip/Tuck. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carver (Nip/Tuck) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
2/3 of the sources used in the article are unreliable, a quick Google search doesn't give sources that establish the character's notability... or at least I think so because it seems like some sources can be used. Either way, I'm unsure, so I'm sending this to AfD. Spinixster (chat!) 03:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Spinixster (chat!) 03:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. No analysis/reception section, what I see is plot summary and trivia about where the character appeared (see MOS:TRIVIA, WP:NOTTVTROPES, etc.). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Piotrus. Not enough WP:SIGCOV to verify the notability of its reception. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.