Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network Universe: FusionFall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. BJTalk 07:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cartoon Network Universe: FusionFall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Future product. Unreferenced except for primary site and a youtube video. Talks about "confirmed" details without sources for verification. Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:N.
- Delete as nominator. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if it is kept unimproved for five days. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 00:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable third party sources. --Banime (talk) 00:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Trivially passes notability guidelines. A quick search on google news for 'fusionfall' shows that it has had articles about it in Variety[1], Wired[2], and Macworld[3] and more can be expected to appear in the next few days. Maybe cut down trhe unsourced information, but don't delete what you can improve. — PyTom (talk) 02:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Trim per PyTom Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Just needs some references. Chaoshi (talk) 19:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep' Sources found by Pytom more than enough (the macworld one in particular). Hobit (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup — found some good sources here, here, and here. Those YouTube links have to go, as well as the other unencyclopedic material. MuZemike (talk) 04:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.