Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carr Hill High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carr Hill High School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles Require Three 3rd party reliable sources for notability standards. The criteria has not been met. ³ SlowhandBlues¯ 14:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep High schools are deemed inherently notable seeWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#education. Article needs improving but there is a source i.e. Ofsted that proves it exists. NtheP (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think Slowhand is a bit quick on the AfD. I don't know of any "three source" requirement - high school or not. I've been attempting to work with an editor today on improving the article with sources. Wikipelli ^Talk 14:27, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Good, good. There's no axe to grind here. It's just, it's been up since April so sources should be found by now. ³ SlowhandBlues¯ 14:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies... what I should have indicated was that I would like to have seen the article tagged for improvement first. I think it's been up since 2009. Wikipelli ^Talk 15:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stubify The main part of the article seems to be a blatant WP:COPYVIO, copy-pasted with minimal changes from the website of the school. here for example is the section on school uniform which is identical to what appears in the article. I haven't checked the rest, but the use of "we" in the later sections also looks like copy-pasting from the school website. I would keep the article but reduce it to a stub (the current lede?) after removing the copyvios. Mathsci (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.