Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carpal Therapist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carpal Therapist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Article is a bit of an advert. Nothing in the way of third party coverage. Only links are to the company that makes and sells this product. Does anyone even know if the refs for this product are legit? Bonewah (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is a total advert. If the argument is that this is a new type of medical device, then if anything it should go under a general article on medical devices. It doesn't matter if the refs for the product are legit. It's still a product advert. Makana Chai (talk) 19:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as spam. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.