Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carousel Piano Bar & Lounge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions} 13:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carousel Piano Bar & Lounge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only claim to fame for this lounge seems to be that a lot of celebrities go here, and placed need more than that to be notable (otherwise even a McD's on Hollywood would qualify for notability) D O N D E groovily Talk to me 12:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has had some very in-depth coverage from multiple sources. [1][2][3][4][5] It's considered "world famous", [6] "local landmark" and "one of the city's most famous bars." [7][8]. Simply not liking one of the reasons a place is notable is not a basis for article deletion.--Oakshade (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but then merge with Hotel Monteleone. There are sources for both, but in many of them it's not easy to distinguish whether the hotel or the bar is really the focus, and one combined article would be more coherent.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has a few online reliable sources and has been mentioned in a number of notable books. Needs some cleanup, but meets notability requirements. Theo Buckley (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.