Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Monroe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-02 02:38Z

Carolyn Monroe[edit]

~~The article does not demonstrate or document any notability e.g., filmography, effect on industry, sources of information~~ --Kevin Murray 14:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rescind my nomination for delete and vote for a keep. Shouldn't we have photo of an actress? --Kevin Murray 04:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO on at least two counts-- #6: "Performer has been notable or prolific within a specific genre niche. " 216 appearances listed at Internet Adult Film Database, (plus four as director) show she was prolific. #7 "There is an original film (not a compilation) named after the performer." At least three films have her name in the title: Carolyn Monroe is the Dream Machine, Carolyn Monroe: Pussyfootin' Around, and Carolyn Super Star -- Dekkappai 01:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would reverse my position if:
- some of the assertions to notability above can be documented at the article.
- the article sounded more encyclopedic and less adoring -- see recent rewrite

--Kevin Murray 00:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. We were re-writing at the same time. I agree with the removal of the fannish prose, but think the article looks better with the intro sentence broken off from the body of the article. But if you disagree, feel free to take it out again. Dekkappai 00:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good!--Kevin Murray 04:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks any reliable sources. I do not agree that PORNBIO, establisheed by a few devotees, provides a valid backdoor route for establishing notability of otherwise nonnotable persons. Edison 00:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:PORNBIO is an accepted guideline, and she clearly meets it. One Night In Hackney 01:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as rewritten.--Kubigula (talk) 01:53, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.