Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Crimi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carolyn Crimi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable children's author; fails WP:NAUTHOR and generally fails WP:GNG. Article is a bit of unsourced biography coatracking a collection of commercial links. Article was previously draftified but was moved back without improvement. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Literature. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Has Kirkus [1] and Publsiher's Weekly reviews [2]. also in Common Sense Media [3] Oaktree b (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:AUTHOR#3 - this author has multiple reviews for multiple works, based on the reviews in the article; the article could be expanded with this independent, reliable and secondary coverage of her career, but the sources are available. She also has an entry in Gale Literature: Contemporary Authors that is included in the article. Beccaynr (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are also a slew of reviews from School Library Journal [4]; these reviews tend to also be available via the Wikipedia Library. One of her books is suggested by another author during a 2020 NPR interview "For A Child Experiencing Anxiety", with an in-depth explanation; this book was also reviewed by the Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books; See also [5], [6]. Beccaynr (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable per Oaktree b and Beccaynr's finds above. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 20:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois, New York, and Vermont. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly meets notability as an author. Thriley (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : She is well-reviewed in reliable and authoritative sources and also has a bio in Contemporary Authors. There is enough evidence of notability for an author. Rublamb (talk) 23:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - lots of reviews = clearly notable author. LadyofShalott 13:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.