Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Cascio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carolyn Cascio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bermuda Triangle story whose only apparent source fails any reliability test, gives no sources of its own and lacks much of the material in the article. No real world news results that I can see, and this passage, in a fit of WP:OR itself, claims that there is no NTSB record of the incident and suggests that it is a hoax. Mangoe (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unverifiable OR - already mentioned at Bermuda Triangle, which is a better location for such claims. Blueboar (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to be fantasy, albeit an amusing one, especially the bit 'explaining' problems with the time travel theory -- Paul B (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete This should be send on a Bermuda Triangle holiday (thinks Boobs).Slatersteven (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Neither Cascio, her passenger nor the aircraft were ever seen again.[1]" As should this article be. - LuckyLouie (talk) 03:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, were they ever seen before? --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They don't even seem to know what her name was.Slatersteven (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And they don't even know how to spell it. [2] - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball in hell. This probably could have been PRODed. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. BE——Critical_{__Talk} 01:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.