Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Schlitt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Schlitt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Her main claim to notability is hosting USA Up All Night. No significant ghits that I can find. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While her filmography indicates that she has done more than just USA Up All Night, the other roles are not significant. The only RS sites that mention her, do just that... only "mention" her. There is no coverage found that meets notability criteria. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP:ENT. LibStar (talk) 05:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article creator comment: GaryGo (talk) 11:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC): Well, do what ya gotta do. I see that the wikipedia stats show 14 hits per day in February 2010. Certainly a low-level personality, but not zero. I don't know what a "significant ghit" is. I think Schlitt is a low-level but legitimate TV/movie personality, but she's keeping a low profile these days. The information is not controversial and it is accurate, as far as it goes. GaryGo (talk) 11:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ghit = Google hit. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Garygo: Ghits refer to Google hits, not Wikipedia hits. If you search for her on Google, you won't come up with enough secondary source coverage. Yoninah (talk) 20:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO. Yoninah (talk) 20:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article creator comment: To be honest, I have no more defense for the Caroline Schlitt page. However, within about 60 seconds today, I found a Wikipedia page for the Queercore group "Hott Beat", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hott_Beat. This page has three links, one to their home page, and then two bad links. Delete Caroline if you must, but I find it hard to see the Wikipedia justification for any music group that plays a couple shows and creates a home page. GaryGo (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. You might want to read WP:OTHERSTUFF. Or you could just nominate Hott Beat for deletion. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Article creator comment: Thanks for pointing out OTHERSTUFF. GaryGo (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.