Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Martin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - As noted below there is no significant coverage of the article's subject. Fails WP:GNG. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Martin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no real claim to notability, local radio presenter, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, local interest only. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Has been though CSD (rejected) and PROD (rejected by pages's originating author). Have tried to explain why it fits criteria for deletion, and that if we had perhaps one more source than the Birmingham Mail (local paper website) I would support keep. As it stands I'm leaning towards delete. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 05:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to be an unremarkable local radio presenter. If additional independent and reliable sources could be located I'll cheerfully change to "Keep", but I wasn't able to find anything after a quick look. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Free Radio Birmingham or something like that. She appears to have made national headlines a couple of times, albeit in a radio industry publication. Incidentally, though I'm not personally much of a BRMB/Free listener these days, I do know her show is syndicated to a few stations. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A well known person if only a local one. References support the article and of course more information can be added at a later date to improve it. Cexycy (talk) 21:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]