Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Berler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Berler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FILMMAKER as the film she made isn't really notable. Unless "Outfest award for Emerging talent" can be considered notable and significant, she also fails WP:ANYBIO. Point to note, the creator of the article is named CBerler. Daiyusha (talk) 07:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find sufficient RS coverage. The article's only independent source (the SF Chronicle article), only mentions the subject once in passing. Colin M (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree per nom and Colin M. Nothing here outside the SFC. Her film is not notable, she won't meet WP:FILMMAKER. Britishfinance (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.