Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carola Remer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carola Remer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As I was perusing categories of model-related articles as I typically do, and I noticed not much if anything has changed here. It’s not personal but I’m nominating for deletion (again). The early life part isn’t bad, it’s the career parts I take issue with. 50% of it is unverifiable. Whatever interview The Cut source did, outside of their ~120 summary, is now a 404 error; they said go to their Model Manual for more info which they have since got rid of years ago. As you can see the page doesn’t work anymore and only a photo is left of it. But here is the Archived version of what it looked like about a decade ago. The only other source here, Die Welt, says more or less the same thing when it comes to career and that she was once on models.com's Top 50 list. Outside of these two, there is no significant coverage—at all. So I don’t believe there is enough notability. (The work isn’t un-notable, it’s about the guideline.) Trillfendi (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for the time being. I broadly agree with your assessment of the sources in the article: the piece in Die Welt is the only source that comes close to being significant coverage in an independent and reliable source. If another solid piece (which the Cut one is not) were to surface, I would say that she was notable under WP:GNG. I have searched the German media and can't say that I've found one. There is no indication that she meets WP:NMODEL either. GNG might not be that far of a reach but with the currently available sourced I'd delete. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.