Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Cummings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Consensus, while not unanimous, indicates Delete --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Cummings

No reliable sources to verify claim of notability. See WP:PORNBIO for criteria for pornographic actress. Lukeisback is porn gossip site. Vinh1313 (talk) 21:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Twinkle crash had failed to complete AFD procedures by posting onto log and article subject. This error wasn't discovered until today. Vinh1313 (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Vinh1313 (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources given. No notability claimed. these two sources appear to refer to different people of the same name --T-rex 23:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N, no sources. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of WP:N Blog and gossip sites are not WP:RS Artene50 (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep and Improve - substantial information removed from the article points to a number of places which may improve the article and the notability of the subject. Such things as "birth name" and movies in which the subject may have appeared which weren't porn using said name. Sourced (although admittedly not well sourced perhaps) information was removed because someone claimed to be the "birth name" person. It is sourced in a number of places other than IMDB. I can't access AVN, FAME, or other possible awarding authority sites from work but, I'm sure there are others that can access the sites to find the verification and improve the article. Additionally, I'm pretty sure Lukeisback is a gossip site in the same way that OK or Hello magazine are (both of which count as reliable sources). Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails sourcing per wp:v and wp:v. -- Jeandré, 2008-06-21t12:14z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.