Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmella Bing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 23:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carmella Bing[edit]

Article as it stands now fails to argue notability as defined by WP:BIO and WP:PORNBIO. - Tabercil 06:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup and references I agree with what the nominator says, but don't draw the same conclusion. Can't respect WP:PORN as a legitimate criteria as it has not received widespread support, and BIO is a mess right now. It seems that with the notability assertion of the author there should be sufficient reference material to support an article per the primary notability criteria. I think that it should be tagged for references, NPOV, and cleanup. --Kevin Murray 18:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS to above, has nearly 500k ghits for "Carmella Bing." Many of the links look to be independent of her control and could be significant upon closer research. Remember that notable is being noticed, not being important (per guidelines). --Kevin Murray 18:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "She is popular for receiving well endowed men in her anus with considerable ease" is not a claim of notability. 500 thousand google hits are par for the course with any porn performer, they only serve to indicate the extent of spamming. It's also doubtful that any sources exist to substantiate the minute extent of actual biographical information presented in this poorly written stub. PORNBIO is at least a decent predictor of notoriety, if not notability, and this actress fails to satisfy PORNBIO criteria ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 08:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - totally unnoteable.Sumoeagle179 03:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete On one hand, she was in Ass Eating Anal Whores. However, 17 films is hardly a notable corpus for a porn star. Some people shoot that many films in a busy week, let alone a career. Nothing here suggests notability over and above the countless other starlets in the business today. Caknuck 10:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.