Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Alyssa Thorne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 13:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Carly Alyssa Thorne[edit]
- Carly Alyssa Thorne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
spam from Voidz. non notable individual, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. sourcing is a mix of imbd, blogs andnon reliable sources. nothing independent or substantial. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Creator blocked for advertising. Apparent vanity. NickCT (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources are mostly all the subject's own self-published words copied from web site to web site. I cannot find any reliable secondary sources. No notable. Jojalozzo 01:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 (talk) 07:38, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.