Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Person (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#3, the nominator is a banned sockpuppet and therefore not supposed to edit and make this nomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Person

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Outside of Person's personal website and some blogs about the 2012 Libertarian Party Convention, Mr. Person doesn't appear to merit an article of his own. A discussion is necessary, but for what it's worth, I vote to delete this article, or at least redirect it to the 2012 Libertarian National Convention.Mis2erP119 (talk)— Mis2erP119 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

SNOW keep - POINTy nomination by possible sock; there's nothing in the article that would warrant deletion. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 05:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 4. Snotbot t • c » 18:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per hmssolent. Contrary to the nom.'s assertion, the subject easily passes WP:GNG with reliably sourced significant coverage (such as this) well beyond his personal website and blogs (which are not used as sources).--JayJasper (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets notability standards. Nominator is likely the same individual that tried to nominate this page last week with the user name of "Carlfuckingperson".--William S. Saturn (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - per hmssolent. Thank you, Wikipedia, for adding the little note that there are very few edits outside a singular topic! öBrambleberry of RiverClan 21:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.