Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiology billing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. * 03:28, 25 May 2010 Nyttend (talk | contribs) deleted "Cardiology billing" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.cardiologybilling.us/) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology billing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is pure original research. I don't see how the topic is relevant in the slightest; any similar article (dentistry billing, getting the check at a restaurant, plumbing bill) seems just as nonsensical as this. No clear CSD category; using AFD primarily because of absolute lack of notability and original research which precludes any chance of reliable third-party sources. — Timneu22 · talk 15:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this material is already better covered at Medical billing (United States), which is itself poorly referenced but written in much more systematic detail. No need for this spinoff. I do not agree that this topic is inherently unnotable, however: medical billing procedures are a significant part of the overall health care crisis in the United States.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No question that medical billing is notable; especially notable for its inefficiency in the US! ;-) — Timneu22 · talk 15:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted; it was rightly identified as a copyvio of http://www.cardiologybilling.us. Nyttend (talk) 03:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.