Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiff Bus Route 53

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff Bus Route 53[edit]

This article has been prodded twice(!) - the first time by me on the basis of a lack of notability (IMHO individual bus routes are rarely going to be notable) and was deprodded by User:SPUI with "enough history" as the edit summary, and the second time by User:Abcdefghijklm who said Seemingly unimportant article. Was attempting to Wikify, but I do not see a reason to keep it anyway. A 20 year old bus route run by a seemingly minor company doesn't seem like a good enough reason to keep it. I still think that it is not notable, and therefore that it should be deleted. -- AJR | Talk 23:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While there is a lot of detailed information about this bus route, that doesn't make the subject any less picayune.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete picayune per above (I had to look that one up ;) --E ivind ^t ^@^c 00:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a bus schedule. --Coredesat talk 01:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's just a bus route, weasel-wording of one of the oldest routes currently operated by Cardiff Bus notwithstanding. --Calton | Talk 04:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete individual bus routes are not notable. SM247 04:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if it was the oldest bus route in the country I might understand, I have put information in the Cardiff Bus article which should more than suffice. There is no need for a full article though.Abcdefghijklm 07:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete buscruft --DaveG12345 07:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Surely bus routes are non-notable, and they change periodically. This is non-encycopaedic and should be left to commercial websites which will keep the infomration up to date. Peterkingiron 23:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.