Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carbon Literacy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Carbon Literacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced reference to a neologism. TN‑X-Man 23:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NEO. Seems to be a promotion for "carbonliteracy.org", a web site established two months ago. --John Nagle (talk) 23:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Textbook definition of a neologism. The potential of it being spam as raised above is also concerning. Fraud talk to me 23:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and merge to Carbon footprint, it is a non notable unsourced, neologism and has no place here.Myheartinchile (talk) 00:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yep, all of the above... Splette :) How's my driving? 00:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- References Posted. A couple of entries have been posted to show that the phrase has been in common use, especially in the UK where its now taught in the public schools, and professional circles. Thanks for looking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CarbonLiteracy (talk • contribs) 01:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleteper WP:NEO. I have been editing many of the environmental articles so I would like to see such an article created when it looses its neologism. status, which I believe it will. The references given do not show that it is not a neologism. CarbonLiteracy has also created the Wiktionary page. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Response Hi Alan, Ok that sounds fine. We'll keep an eye out for it. Thanks. CarbonLiteracy --CarbonLiteracy (talk) 01:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the above. --WilliamRoper (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable neologism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:48, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.