Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cara A
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cara A (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable artist. While references are given, none of them other than the artist's own pages at edicypages.com (a self-publishing site) actually refer to this artist. Even the image that is used is a generic image of artwork from a museum, not the artist's own work. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Saw this on the new article page and does seem to claim notability, but its claims don't pan out; it is obviously harder to establish somebody as notable when they have a hidden identity.--YixilTesiphon TalkContribs 20:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As noted by the nominator, none of the citations from third-party sources actually mention the artist, establish that her art has been exhibited where the article says it has, or establish the notability of the work. If readers simply look at the article and don't check the cites, it may give the illusion of notability. --JamesAM (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails to meet WP:N: lack of suitable sources. Ty 19:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Doesn't seem ready for an encyclopedia...Modernist (talk) 04:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.