Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captive State

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 04:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Captive State

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NBOOK bobrayner (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Passes WP:NBOOK criteria #1.--JayJasper (talk) 20:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are more sources, reviews in The Guardian, Ecologist;Dec2003, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p11 and still another one at Lloyd, J. (2001). Britain's lonely left. Foreign Policy, 126:82–84. Can be used to grow the article from its one-sentence birth. Churn and change (talk) 00:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.