Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Sim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Sim[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost all sources are primary, this is an orphaned stub, and I'm unsure it meets the notability guidelines. King of Scorpions (my talk) 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Speedy deleted and recreated multiple times, so getting a consensus seems more appropriate than a WP:SOFTDELETE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just a lowkey advert and no indication that this comes close to meeting WP:GNG Sulfurboy (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It does get mentioned in one paper, which a WP:BEFORE should have turned up.[1] Nevertheless this is not enough to establish notability. The paper uses it as a comparison, just an example of simulation software. That is about it though, so not notable for its own page. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:NOTCHANGELOG. --BonkHindrance (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.