Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain America: The First Avenger (toy line)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only keep argument relies on WP:NOTPAPER, but also fails to demonstrate how the related WP:NOTEVERYTHING is met.

On the other side of the coin, none of the arguments to delete are terribly persuasive either. Still, it's hard to see how I could close this as anything other than delete, given the material I have to work with. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Captain America: The First Avenger (toy line)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This toy line fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 16:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agreed. I fail to see the importance or relevance of this article. Parsley Man (talk) 17:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:51, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Basing my comment on not paper; this is the sort of article that expands our coverage of areas better than a paper encyclopedia would. It should be thought of as appended to Marvel Toys. It's quite a tidy, informative article, certainly not subject to the excesses of some. Hiding T 15:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - like the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Man 2 (toy line), this short lived line won't ever be an informatively substantial article by itself. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.