Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cape Codder (cocktail)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 04:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Codder (cocktail)[edit]

Delete already covered at Cape Cod (disambiguation), with no real sources for either, but it certainly exists in multiple recipes with or without lime juice/sugar - but not much else can be said about it, lack of potential to be much more than a one liner better handled on the dab page. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possible Speedy A3. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 23:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the article doesn't really qualify as a rephrasing of the title due to the identifier, as it's not really part of the item name. There is context - 'Cape codder is a cocktail' may be short, but it certainly fulfils the definition of context at wiktionary ("the text in which a word or passage appears and which helps ascertain its meaning") - the meaning is clear. - Toon⁰⁵ 00:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it's a pretty popular cocktail, definitely notable. Article does need expansion, however, preferably some references - there seem to be quite a few cocktail sites out there. A valid stub IMO. - Toon⁰⁵ 00:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- There's no reason for this not to be a page. It's a legitimate cocktail and does not belong as merely a line on the Cape Cod disambiguation. It certainly needs expansion but should not be deleted. Quentinisgod (talk) 03:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The article needs expanding, to be certain. But the drink is real and notable. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.