Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caparezza demos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Caparezza. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ricomincio da Capa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources or coverage of any kind.--WTF (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages:[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 5. Snotbot t • c » 01:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Caparezza as it seems unlikely this album is independently notable, unless someone can find chart evidence to the contrary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect - per WP:NRVE "...evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity..." ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 00:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.