Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not for something you made up in school one day; no references cited (the Language Construction Kit is a guide to how to make a conlang, it doesn't reference Cantate at all); listed as having one speaker, thus clearly fails the notability guidelines. PROD tag removed. Miskwito 23:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dewrad 23:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom.You beat me to it, you bastard. --Miskwito 23:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]- You don't need to "delete as nominator". By writing the nomination and doing the legwork, it kind of implies that you stand for the article's deletion. -- saberwyn 23:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- not definately, we only presume that. he might have intended it to be merged into a page which deals with nonsense on the net! Mike33 23:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, a merger is covered by WP:BOLD and does not require AFD if that is the intent (there are rare exceptions). It's generally unnecessary for the nominator to add "delete as nom" in AFD, although it seems to be the practice in a few other places like WP:RM. --Dhartung | Talk 23:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. My bad, sorry. --Miskwito 00:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, a merger is covered by WP:BOLD and does not require AFD if that is the intent (there are rare exceptions). It's generally unnecessary for the nominator to add "delete as nom" in AFD, although it seems to be the practice in a few other places like WP:RM. --Dhartung | Talk 23:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- not definately, we only presume that. he might have intended it to be merged into a page which deals with nonsense on the net! Mike33 23:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nominator says it all. Calgary 23:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - clear-cut WP:NFT case. --Haemo 23:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Big round of applause for gumption but its not the place. Mike33 23:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced. --Dhartung | Talk 23:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. unsourced, non-notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above. Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.