Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon FL 85-300mm lens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects at editorial discretion Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canon FL 85-300mm lens[edit]

Canon FL 85-300mm lens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:N. The creator removed a prod in 2009. SL93 (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Existence does not equal notability, and there seems to be no coverage of this lens to prove it is somehow notable. Drmies (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Canon FL lens mount. It's not a well-known or historic lens with no claim to stand out of the ordinary, and doesn't appear to be covered in reliable sources, just in databases, lists, sales, forums, etc. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- unsourced prose on an unremarkable accessory. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above.Light2021 (talk) 19:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.