Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canela (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canela (footballer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Just found this [1] in WP:BEFORE. The athlete only has spells in the minor divisions of football in Rio de Janeiro, with nothing relevant to justify an article. Svartner (talk) 04:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Per new sources found. Svartner (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - some of the sources added are good enough for me, good work! Giant Snowman 18:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ due to a lack of significant coverage — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No SIGCOV and an incomplete draft of an article to boot. Anwegmann (talk) 21:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per evidence shown after my original vote. Anwegmann (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ - will be adding as much information to the article as I can later today, has been a busy week. I’m not sure it’ll be enough for GNG, but it’ll give a better picture for this debate. Should have all info added by 19:00 GMT. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe not enough to save the article from deletion, but have filled it out with information. If he becomes more notable in future, then this version of the article is a better place to start than the blank shell that was there previously. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - also voting keep as I believe he just about meets GNG in the Rio de Janeiro area. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Svartner, GiantSnowman, MaxnaCarta, and Anwegmann: The article has been substantially expanded. Thoughts? BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am uncertain if the coverage amounts to enough for me to justify a vote for Keep. However, for the sake of consensus, I am withdrawing my delete vote. With this level of coverage, I'd normally abstain from voting. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess new additions to this article's content.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - @Svartner:, Per above. Young player with ongoing career and sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 09:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has been expanded enough thanks to great work from everyone :) RossEvans18

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.