Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Charms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 02:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Candy Charms[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all three criterias mentioned in WP:PORNBIO and is not a WP:1E, not notable to have an article. Pahlevun (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:14, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 06:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 06:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pseudobiography of one event. Makes no claim of passing PORNBIO. Glamour model/porn star goes to Iran. Iranians are upset. Tabloid fodder not of encyclopedic interest. • Gene93k (talk) 12:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- non notable and fails GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Iranian foreign minister is interfering on the subject. the controversy is underway right now some important media such as daily mail, RT and VOA is messing up with the subject. Amir Muhammad 22:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable pornographic actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, BIO1E not enough, if the Iranian government is upset, then redirect to their article. Daily Mail not RS for foreign policy kerfuffles. Montanabw^(talk) 22:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "She is known for her Large enhanced breasts.[citation needed]" .... really ? ..... Having large boobs isn't a free pass to an article!, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 02:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment she may not be notable in her fields, but only BBC wrote about his controversial in Iran . i thing its Important. The Stray Dog by Sadeq Hedayat 23:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's important whatsoever. –Davey2010^Talk 00:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

maybe . tnx anyway The Stray Dog by Sadeq Hedayat 14: 42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 16:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.