Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canditv (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Canditv[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not convinced this meets WP:GNG . Gets a few passing mentions for being a sponsor of a cycling team. LibStar (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The appropriate WP:SNG for products like this is WP:NCORP. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per HighKing. I was unable to find reliable sources to support keeping this page, and the sources already on the page (some of which I could not open) are not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV. Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems the "currently" in the article was added back in 2008 *with never having any source), and first keep was because of the "awards" which might not be as fluffy as many in the USA (usually mean taking the reporter to lunch) but still not notable by today's standards. The company is still around, selling software to manager commercial truckers, while this product seems to have quietly gone defunct around seven or eight years ago. W Nowicki (talk) 19:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.