Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Barnes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. X clamation point 02:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Barnes[edit]

I don't know why this page was set up about me. I have corrected the information initally posted (as there were glaring factual errors) but I really do recommend it be deleted. I'm definitely not notable or worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Lolliebuzz piebarnes (talk) 02:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC) Text copied from article's talk page. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 13:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tending toward keep Aren't television presenters generally considered notable, and aren't these awards enough to guarantee notability? I'm not familiar with these awards, so I'm not sure, but this person seems notable to me. Nyttend (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete at subject's request. Basic courtesy plus WP:BLP.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 14:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy due to subjects clear wishes. PHARMBOY (TALK) 18:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject's request has nothing to do with this deliberation, otherwise many other articles would be deleted from Wikipedia when the subject is notable. In this case, however, the article does not meet WP:CREATIVE to warrant keeping. WWGB (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BLP and WP:Notability. Bidgee (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ignoring "supposed" subjects request (I'm sorry but, without proof I'm disinclined to automatically believe these claims). The article itself still seems to fails our criteria for inclusion based on the notability and [[WP:V| verifiability}} issues. I don't see anyWP:BLP concerns at all though so if someone would be kind enough to educate me on what in the article is causing "concern" it would be greatly appreciated. Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I'm not seeing any real notability here beyond being a garden-variety regional newsreader. One award, but it doesn't strike me as enough for WP:BIO. Note that a comment from someone on the talk page who may or may not be the person in question was not factored into my decision. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.