Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Adams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Adams[edit]

Candice Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is only sourced to this person's team player bios. We need sources outside the team to show that they are actually notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 26. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • She played in the top netball league in the world, the ANZ Championship – if only briefly it seems. Netball doesn't seem to have a place at WP:NSPORTS so not sure what our usual practice is. You could write a good few paragraphs on her; playing in the second tier, breaking in sporadically to a strong Firebirds team, ultimately moving to Victoria for her education. But that is more from piecing other sources together than ever getting one really big write up that would put it over the top for GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.