Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancer conspiracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DS 18:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer conspiracy[edit]

First Deletion Reason: Fabricated conspiracy cruft original research. Thought to implement a New World Order/The Brotherhood of Death (aka Order of the Skull & Bones) imperative to depopulate the Earth. Article fails to assert notability by reference to a single reputable source. Complete bullocks. Kill it before it has a chance to metastasize. Wikipedia commands you! Morton Devonshire^Yo 17:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - if only I could have speedied but alas not CSD criteria... "complete bullocks" per Mr. Devonshire Glen 17:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You didn't prod it as your edit summary promised? And delete per nom for the record. Kavadi carrier 17:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was going to but since writing that the creator removed my prod tag from another of his articles so figured I'd have to afd (as I had to with that one. Luckily (being lazy...) I was beaten to the punch :) Glen 17:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per nom. --- RockMFR 17:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this really could have been prodded. Andrew Levine 17:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew see my comment re prodding above Glen 17:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, such a crazy theory that you'd never find enough people to make it notable. Probably a candidate for WP:SNOW--Rosicrucian 17:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't tell if this is a joke GabrielF 17:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Complete bollocks that provides links to moronic conspiracy theory sites in place of verification. Personally I'm glad this went AfD, I doubt the ProD would have gone full term and, with this debate on file, we can speedy any recreations. -- IslaySolomon | talk 17:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is enough sources of people alledging an AIDS conspiracy to keep an article on it, however not a cancer one, this is actually the first time I ever heard such a thing. --Nuclear~~Zer0~~ 18:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.