Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canasvieiras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 20:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canasvieiras

Tourist brochure entry about a non-notable beach. Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems to be enough info at Canasvieiras for translation into English Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Translation/Canasvieiras. -- Bebestbe (talk) 02:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's an article about the region called Canasvieiras. This article is about a beach with that name. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 03:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect - the first line of the Portuguese article translates as: "Canasvieiras is a neighborhood and a beach located in the north of the island of Santa Catarina..." There is a note at the top of it saying something like "For the region in Bahia, click on Canavieiras." Orderinchaos 12:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Santa Catarina (island) since they're both stubs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 03:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. JIP | Talk 05:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, failing improvement, Merge Per comments made by Bebestbe. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If this were an Australian or Canadian location it would simply be regarded as a stub, which it is. The Portuguese article on the subject should be made a priority for translation. Orderinchaos 17:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a basic go at it myself just now, but others should not feel constrained by my efforts - my knowledge of Portuguese is sadly limited to Google Translate. Orderinchaos 12:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, no question that this is a genuine geographical location and long-standing precedent and consensus is that these are notable enough for Wikipedia articles. --Stormie (talk) 03:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Stormie. --Lockley (talk) 16:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.