Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Association of Magicians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Association of Magicians[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Without any references, it seems like this article will have to vanish into thin air. Wolfson5 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Wolfson5 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I see a couple of book references (1 2) but both appear to be brief copied descriptions from CAM's website. Other than that only passing mentions in the media. FOARP (talk) 10:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and FOARP. I've looked through all the non-duplicate Google web and news search results. Press coverage is practically non-existent, but that which does exist is mere passing mentions or trivial coverage, including this business column from my local paper which also has a blurb about my optometrist. Web search results, likewise, are all trivial coverage, passing mentions, and directory listings, which don't qualify. Haven't looked through all the book results, but have looked through most of them and they appear just to be passing mentions, references in a tangential way, or bibliographic citations. Doug Mehus T·C 02:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.