Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada and the 2000 United States presidential election

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theo polisme 01:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canada and the 2000 United States presidential election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another international reaction to a US election article which pretty much states that there wasn't a significant reaction, not that anyone was surprised. Perhaps some small section of the material could be used in the main election article. Mangoe (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 17:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 17:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 17:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 17:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is being watched and commented on at wp:WikiProject Editor RetentionOttawahitech (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge page, this page, this page, and this page into Canada and the United States presidential elections. There is no reason to document Canadian reaction to specific US presidential elections, but the general topic is probably suitable, and an article on Canadian responses to US elections should not grow out of proportion. 184.157.242.229 (talk) 08:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The material was reported in reliable sources. The article is somewhat interesting, although I have the feeling that people there somehow got the message that it was "cool" to root for Al Gore -- not that there was any real substance (or consequence) to their opinions. But I don't think that means the article has to be deleted. BigJim707 (talk) 09:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A perfectly good and notable topic. Everyking (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.