Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CanYa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 09:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CanYa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a non-notable app that was declined at AfC and then created in the mainspace. The vast majority of the references here are to the company's own blog, and the only independent source I can find and verify either in the article or on Google is inclusion in a list of new apps by HuffPost Australia, far below what would be required by WP:ORGDEPTH. The article itself makes the claim it has 4000 users, which demonstrates how small this startup is. No reason to include at this time. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.