Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CanGèneTest
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CanGèneTest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I recently PRODed this on the grounds that it had been unsourced since 2010 and I could not find any sources: it looked like the organisation was shortlived and not notable. PROD declined by another editor on the grounds that there are sources on Google scholar and Google books. This is correct - there are one or two passing refs but some are for other organisations called Apogee-Net and none of them look to me like they establish notability. Bringing this to AfD to seek consensus. Mccapra (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No significant coverage, not notable. Natureium (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No WP:SIGCOV demonstrates that the company does not pass WP:GNG and if it is indeed defunct, then it never will. Newshunter12 (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.